REVIEW ARTICLE


Ethics in Quality Improvement with in Health Care - Focusing on the Improvement



Lars Sandman*
Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 924
Abstract HTML Views: 589
PDF Downloads: 526
ePub Downloads: 400
Total Views/Downloads: 2439
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 450
Abstract HTML Views: 253
PDF Downloads: 243
ePub Downloads: 148
Total Views/Downloads: 1094



© 2017 Lars Sandman.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden; Tel: +46 (0) 732 065818; E-mail: lars.sandman@liu.se


Abstract

Background:

Health-care is permeated with ethical values and norms and so there are ethical implications to all interventions which changes practice, and this includes quality improvement (QI). The interest for ethics in QI so far has not had an explicit focus on the ethics of the actual improvement. Contrasting this with health technology assessment (HTA), we there find an almost exclusive interest in the ethics of the developed technology, and less regard for the other ethical aspects related to development, evaluation and implementation of the technology.

Method:

We identify how a research ethics perspective on QI differs from the ethics of the actual improvement or change. It will be argued that the field of ethics in QI can benefit from the development of ethics within HTA by raising awareness of the need to ethically assess the actual improvement or change, and by using models for this found within HTA. For an ethical analysis of quality improvement, elderly care in the Swedish context will be given as a tentative example.

Conclusion:

The existing frameworks for ethical assessment within HTA need further development for use within QI. In essence, the introduction of new technologies within health-care could be viewed as a quality improvement, where considerations generally acknowledged within QI are relevant to consider in relation to all potential technologies to be used within health-care.