REVIEW ARTICLE


Nipple Reconstruction Techniques: Which is the Best Choice?



Nicolò Bertozzi1, *, Francesco Simonacci1, Marianna Pesce2, PierLuigi Santi2, Edoardo Raposio1
1 Department of Medicine and Surgery, Plastic Surgery Division, University of Parma; Cutaneous, Mini- invasive, Regenerative and Plastic Surgery Unit, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
2 Department of Surgery and Related Methodologies, Plastic Surgery Section, San Martino-IST University of Genova, Genova, Italy


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
5
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 6711
Abstract HTML Views: 1611
PDF Downloads: 700
ePub Downloads: 569
Total Views/Downloads: 9591
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 3872
Abstract HTML Views: 960
PDF Downloads: 510
ePub Downloads: 390
Total Views/Downloads: 5732



Creative Commons License
© 2018 Bertozzi et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Medicine and Surgery, Plastic Surgery Division, University of Parma; Cutaneous, Mini- invasive, Regenerative and Plastic Surgery Unit, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy, Tel: +393342439587; E-mail: nicolo.bertozzi@yahoo.com


Abstract

Nipple-Areolar Complex (NAC) reconstruction represents the final, concluding journey of breast reconstruction by being able to give to reconstructed breasts the shape of a natural breast mound. Nevertheless an enormous amount of nipple reconstruction techniques are described in literature, given the fact that most reconstructive options fail to give satisfactory outcomes in relation to the long-term nipple projection. In this review, the authors will browse most common nipple reconstruction techniques, taking into account: Indication, outcome, and side effect. Composite nipple grafts, traditional flaps, flaps with autologous graft augmentation, flaps with allograft augmentation, and flaps with alloplastic augmentation are the main strategies employed nowadays. Composite nipple grafts give the best guarantee of color-texture match with the contralateral side and show satisfactory nipple projection even at long-term follow-up. Skate, star, C-V, and arrow flap are by far the most commonly employed and the most reliable local flaps, however loss of projection of up to 70 percent are reported in literature. Alloplastic grafts were associated with the lowest rates of projection loss followed by autologous and allogenic ones. Nevertheless allogenic grafts are also associated with the highest complication rate, while autologous and allogenic ones have similar rates. Infection, seroma, and fat necrosis are the more commonly reported complications of autologous grafting along with donor site morbidity, while allogenic and alloplastic augmentation grafts may also experience the risk of overcorrection and graft exposure. Given the numerous techniques described in literature it is clear that the ideal nipple reconstruction hasn’t been found yet. Whereas it should be chosen on case to case basis depending on type of mastectomy, radiotherapy, type of reconstruction, skin thickness, tissue condition, and patients’ expectations to ensure the best cosmetic outcome.

Keywords: Nipple-areola complex reconstruction, Breast cancer, Breast reconstruction, Plastic Surgery, Surgical techniques, Alloplastic grafts, Allogenic grafts.