All published articles of this journal are available on ScienceDirect.
Salivary Proteomics and Its Role in the Early Detection of Oral Cancer: A New Frontier in Noninvasive Diagnostics
Abstract
Oral cancer, especially Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC), is a major worldwide health issue, exhibiting a high mortality rate due to late detection. Conventional methods of diagnosis are invasive and painful for the patient. Saliva can be used as an attractive, non invasive, and economical source of biomarker information, and salivary proteomics the large scale analysis of proteins in human saliva can be a promising platform for identifying potential protein biomarkers. This paper discusses the evolution of saliva as a diagnostic tool, identifies saliva proteins as potential oral cancer biomarkers, explores new technologies used to perform salivary proteomics, and examines the barriers that hinder the acceptance of salivary proteomics as a diagnostic tool for patients. Considering ongoing progress, salivary diagnostics can be expected to be a game changer for early cancer diagnosis and mediate personalized treatment concepts.
1. INTRODUCTION
Saliva has traditionally been underappreciated as a diagnostic medium for disease. Nevertheless, its multifaceted constitution and non-invasiveness make it an attractive candidate for clinical application. Saliva, secreted by submandibular, sublingual and parotid glands, is made of water, electrolytes, many proteins, enzymes, immunoglobulins, hormones, and antimicrobial substances. These factors reflect the health of the mouth and the body [1, 2].
The advent of “salivaomics,” including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and microbiomics, highlights the growing interest in saliva as a diagnostic fluid. Proteomics is especially noteworthy among all these omics, given that proteins play a critical role in the pathways leading to disease and biological processes [3-5].
2. BIOMARKERS IN SALIVA: SALIVARY BIOMARKERS OF ORAL CANCER
OC, particularly OSCC, occurs through a multi-step process that involves genetic and epigenetic alterations that drive cell transformation. Diagnosis is often delayed as the early lesions are usually asymptomatic or resemble benign lesions [6]. Such treatment delay leads to dismal prognoses and decreased survival. Saliva proteomics provides an unprecedented opportunity for the early diagnosis of these cancer-related molecular changes during the course of the disease. Several salivary proteins have been reported to be differentially up-regulated or modified in patients with oral cancer. These biomarkers represent different aspects of cancer, such as inflammation, angiogenesis, resistance to apoptosis, and metastasis [7-13]. These proteins can be used as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for identifying benign and malignant lesions, as well as disease recurrence. There are several key natural advantages of saliva diagnostics over tissue and blood sampling, as shown in Table 1:
| Biomarker | Functional Role | Diagnostic Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| IL-6, IL-8 | Inflammatory and angiogenic cytokines | Indicate precancerous and cancerous changes |
| CD44 | Cell adhesion and migration | Highly expressed in malignant oral tissues |
| Cyfra 21-1 | Cytokeratin fragment | Elevated in OSCC, aids differentiation |
| CA 125 | Tumor-associated antigen | Reflects tumor burden |
| p53 autoantibodies | Tumor suppressor mutation marker | Found in the saliva and serum of OSCC patients |
| MMP-8, MMP-9 | Extracellular matrix degradation | Associated with invasion and metastasis |
| bFGF | Promoter of angiogenesis | Increased during active tumour progression |
Table 1: Advantages of Saliva as a Diagnostic Medium.
Noninvasive: It does not use needles or surgery, so patients experience minimal pain and risk.
Cost Efficiency: Simpler collection, storage and blood processing reduce healthcare costs.
Safety: Less risk of infection, safer for the patient and medical professional.
Ease of Being Monitored Frequently: It allows for more than one time-point testing, making it suitable for long-term studies and disease diagnosis.
Patient Acceptance: Better compliance from patients to deliver a sample, as it is noninvasive.
Furthermore, as OSCC arises from the oral cavity, the saliva directly interacts with the diseased tissue. It is a significant fluid used to monitor disease-specific changes in this context.
Several clinical studies have provided robust evidence supporting the diagnostic potential of salivary proteomics in the detection of oral cancer. For instance, salivary Interleukin-8 [IL-8] and Interleukin-6 [IL-6] have been consistently reported to be elevated in patients with OSCC, with diagnostic sensitivities above 80% in some cohorts, highlighting their value as inflammatory biomarkers linked to malignant transformation. Similarly, CD44, a cell surface glycoprotein involved in tumour invasion and metastasis, has been detected at significantly higher concentrations in the saliva of OSCC patients compared to healthy controls, suggesting its role as a non-invasive diagnostic marker. More recently, Kaul-Ghanekar et al. (2025) [14] demonstrated that the salivary Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) ratio could discriminate oral cancer patients from tobacco users without cancer, thereby underscoring the potential of proteomics-based salivary biomarkers in high-risk populations. Together, these findings validate that proteomic alterations in saliva closely mirror oncogenic changes in oral tissues and can be translated into clinically relevant diagnostic assays.
3. TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THE SALIVARY PROTEOMICS
Proteomic studies depend on the mass determination and quantification of saliva proteins, often in minute amounts. Advances in analytical technologies have increased protein detection sensitivity, resolution, and quality. Mass Spectrometry (MS), Liquid Chromatography (LC), and electrophoresis are the standard tools used in salivary proteomics [15-17].
These methods are capable of profiling the salivary proteome with unprecedented accuracy and uncovering PTMs, including phosphorylation and glycosylation, which could have functional implications for proteins in disease Table 2.
| Technology | Function | Diagnostic Contribution |
|---|---|---|
| Mass Spectrometry | Protein identification and quantification | Detects biomarkers at low concentrations |
| LC-MS/MS | Protein sequencing and structural analysis | Comprehensive proteome profiling |
| 2D Electrophoresis | Separation of proteins based on size and charge | Visual comparison of protein expression |
| Hexapeptide Libraries | Compress protein dynamic range | Enhances detection of rare proteins |
4. CHALLENGES AND LIMITATIONS
However, salivary proteomics is associated with several technical and biological limitations:
4.1. Variation in Sample
The composition of saliva is affected by hydration, circadian rhythms, feeding, medications and oral hygiene.
4.2. PTMs: The Ornaments of Nature
Post-translational modifications make protein identification more complex and require sophisticated analytical instruments.
4.3. Lack of Standardized Saliva Procedures
The absence of standard protocols and methodological approaches used to collect, handle, and process saliva is a limitation to the study of saliva biomarkers due to issues regarding replication.
4.4. Cost and Infrastructure
Proteomic high-throughput technologies are costly and generally unavailable in low-resource settings.
These challenges can be overcome through joint efforts to develop guidelines and benchmarks, lower the cost of technology, and integrate proteomics into current clinical practices.
5. FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
This necessitates the need for salivary proteomics in personalized medicine in the future. The availability of POC devices for the fast testing of salivary biomarkers would dramatically change the way practitioners approach the screening and treatment of oral cancer [18-21]. Moreover, an integrated analysis of proteomic information with genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics (multi-omics) would increase the knowledge on the disease process [22-24, 14].
Validation of existing biomarker candidates and identification of robust signatures with high sensitivity and specificity require large-scale clinical trials [25, 26]. Artificial intelligence and machine learning–based algorithms may play a central role in deciphering complex proteomes to identify predictive patterns of disease.
Beyond preliminary biomarker discovery, clinical validation studies are beginning to establish salivary proteomics as a reliable tool for cancer detection and diagnosis. Large-scale proteomic profiling, combined with machine learning, has been shown to enhance the accuracy of distinguishing OSCC patients from controls by integrating multiple protein signatures rather than relying on single biomarkers. In a recent multi-centre study, a panel including MMP-9, Cyfra 21-1, and IL-8 achieved sensitivities and specificities above 85% for early oral cancer diagnosis, indicating that multiplex proteomic assays may soon complement or even replace invasive biopsy procedures. Furthermore, advances in point-of-care devices are facilitating the translation of these findings into chairside applications, where clinicians could rapidly screen at-risk individuals using small saliva samples. As highlighted by Kaul-Ghanekar et al. [14] and other emerging investigations, the integration of validated salivary biomarker panels with artificial intelligence-driven interpretation holds promise for achieving real-time, non-invasive, and highly accurate cancer diagnostics.
CONCLUSION
Salivary proteomics is emerging as an innovative technique for detecting and monitoring oral cancer. The noninvasive profiling of proteins specific to the disease process enables new opportunities for regular screenings, monitoring responses to treatment, and screening for recurrences. Although technical and practical hurdles remain, the continued development of proteomic and bioinformatics technologies is gradually and surely clearing the path for saliva-based diagnostics to be accepted into routine clinical practice.
With further research, salivary diagnostics could enhance overall survival rates among OSCC patients and set new benchmarks for the early detection of many systemic diseases.
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS
The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: V.B.: Study conception and design, R.F.: Data collection; C.B.: Analysis and interpretation of results; D.F., L.C., G.G.: Draft manuscript; C.B.: D.F.: All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
| OSCC | = Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
| MS | = Mass Spectrometry |
| LC | = Liquid Chromatography |
| EGF | = Epidermal Growth Factor |
| EGFR | = Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor |
| IL-8 | = Interleukin-8 |
| IL-6 | = Interleukin-6 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Declared none.

