Rate of Vascular Access Preparation in Hemodialysis Patients and Associated Baseline Characteristics in Jazan Region, Saudi Arabia: A Multicentre Study

All published articles of this journal are available on ScienceDirect.

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Rate of Vascular Access Preparation in Hemodialysis Patients and Associated Baseline Characteristics in Jazan Region, Saudi Arabia: A Multicentre Study

Open Medicine Journal 28 Nov 2024 RESEARCH ARTICLE DOI: 10.2174/0118742203310950240827110852

Abstract

Background

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) treated with hemodialysis is a major global health concern. Delayed preparation for renal replacement therapy can lead to adverse consequences. We aimed to determine the rate of vascular access preparation in hemodialysis patients and the associated baseline characteristics in the Jazan region, Saudi Arabia.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional observational study using patients’ medical records and complimentary direct patient interviews during their hemodialysis sessions in different Jazan region centers.

Results

The study included 310 patients, of which 58.1% were male, 45.5% aged 40 to 60 years, and 50% were non-Saudi. Hypertension was the cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in 42.6% of participants, with renal artery stenosis and lupus being the least common causes. Regarding the association between ESRD causes and demographic factors, we found only age and marital status were statistically significant. We also found that only the education level is statistically associated with early referral for vascular access placement.

Conclusion

ESRD was more common among middle-aged males, and hypertension was the most likely cause. Our study showed that the arteriovenous fistula was used only in 50% of patients as vascular access for hemodialysis. Compared to other demographic factors, education level has significantly affected the early referral rates for vascular access placement.

Keywords: End-stage renal disease, Hemodialysis, Vascular access preparation, Renal replacement, Arteriovenous fistula, Demographic factors.

1. INTRODUCTION

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is rapidly being recognized as a significant health threat that is associated with premature mortality and substantial social and economic consequences. It is considered an independent risk factor for various health issues including cardiovascular diseases, cognitive dysfunction, increased rate of hospitalization, and all-cause mortality [1, 2].

In the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a critical health concern. Currently, there are approximately 20,000 patients undergoing renal dialysis in Saudi Arabia. The cumulative prevalence of both modalities of renal replacement treatment in Saudi Arabia is predicted to be about 300 per million population [3].

There is a universal agreement that patients with CKD should undergo multidisciplinary clinical preparation for at least six months before starting renal replacement therapy (RRT) [4]. Adequate preparation before RRT is essential to maximize the patient's quality of health status [5]. The CKD patients who are adequately prepared for RRT in the form of regular screening and monitoring have exhibited a slower decline in kidney function, shorter hospital stay, and reduced rate of death before reaching the end stage. The screening and monitoring programs include early referral to a nephrologist, education, management of comorbidities and complications, early placement of dialysis access, adequate time initiation of dialysis, and pre-emptive kidney transplantation [6-8].

According to the KDIGO Guideline (Kidney Disease Initiative Global Outcomes), the patients should be prepared when they reach stage four (estimated glomerular filtration rate 15-30 ml/min/1.732) [9]. However, it has been shown that CKD patients are far more likely to die than to attain RRT because it was instituted lately [10-12].

In the United States, over 110,000 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) begin their maintenance hemodialysis every year. However, there’s a significant proportion of CKD patients who are inadequately prepared for RRT even those who are referred earlier to the nephrologists. Moreover, the vast majority of patients who are already on hemodialysis lack permanent vascular access [13].

In a large retrospective study conducted on 1057 French patients who started dialysis between 1989 and 1998, the 5-year cardiovascular survival was found to be significantly lower in patients who had been referred late (less than 6 months) compared to those who had been referred earlier (between 3 and 6 years) or more than 6 years (57.8% vs 77.1% vs 65.3%), respectively before the start of hemodialysis [14].

To the best of our knowledge, there is a lack of data regarding the preparation rate for hemodialysis in Saudi Arabia, reflecting this study’s importance. This study is the first to be conducted in the region to address this issue. It aims to determine the rate of vascular access preparation in hemodialysis patients and their baseline characteristics.

2. MATERIAL AND METHODS

2.1. Study Setting, Design, and Population

This cross-sectional observational study used patients’ medical records and direct patient interviews during their hemodialysis sessions. Using a prespecified data collection template, the data had been collected from patients' files and recorded. Any missing data in patients’ charts had been gathered from the patients directly during their HD sessions. We conducted our study in different hemodialysis centers in Jazan. Jazan region is located in the southwest of Saudi Arabia, with a population of 1.6 million people based on the last census report. There are eight dialysis centers affiliated with MOH that serve around 1,153 hemodialysis patients throughout the region [15].

Our study targeted all adult patients (> 18 years) with ESRD who are already on hemodialysis and performing their hemodialysis sessions essentially in Jazan. Those who declined consent to participate in the study, pediatric patients, and those who have ESRD as a result of acute kidney injury (AKI) were excluded from this study.

2.2. Sample Size and Sampling Technique

The study followed the simple random method of sampling. The Raosoft sample size calculator (http://www. Raosoft.com/samplesize.html) was used for sample size estimation. Given that the population size of dialysis patients in the Jazan region is about 1153 hemodialysis patients with a 95% confidence interval and leaving 5% for sample error; thereby, the estimated minimum sample size was 310 individuals. We divided this number propor- tionately among the eight dialysis units to get a representative sample for all dialysis patients.

2.3. Study Instruments and Data Collection Method

After consenting the eligible patients, the data were gathered by the study investigators who were distributed over the different HD centers. The variables of data collection included demographic and clinical character- istics (age, gender, education level, monthly income, marital status, nationality, residence, and the cause of ESRD) and hemodialysis data (prior screening for CKD, whether patients had referral early for hemodialysis or not, reasons for late referral, current vascular access). The preparation is considered late if patients with advanced CKD have urgent indications to initiate hemodialysis without previous attempts for arteriovenous vascular access placement or if preparation started when eGFR has fallen below 5-7 ml/min/1.732 [16].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All data were entered into Microsoft Excel 2016. We used Microsoft SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solutions, version 27, 2020) for statistical tests. We presented our descriptive statistics in numbers and percentages. We used the Chi-square test to find out the relations between the data variables. A two-sided p-value of <0.05 has been considered an indicator of statistical significance. Tables and figures have been used to express the results.

2.5. Ethical Approval

The study was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee-MOH in Jazan. Approval No.:22060; date:29 June 2022. For participants whose data were not available in the electronic system, informed consent was taken. The research participants were assured that there was no harm from this study. Respect for the dignity of the research participants was prioritized. The anonymity of individuals participating in the research was guaranteed. Data collected from study participants were used only for scientific purposes. All participants had the right to stay or withdraw at any time from the study. Any misinformation and representation of the raw data results in a biased manner were avoided. All data obtained from participants through hospital records were kept in a safe place with high confidentiality.

3. RESULTS

In this study, we were able to collect data from 310 patients in the Jazan region during the period from August 2022 until June 2023. Among the participants, 58.1% were males. The age of 45.5% of the participants was between 40-60 years, while 27.4% of them were between 20-40 years. Only one-fifth of this cohort aged more than 60 years (21.3%). Saudis and non-Saudis were distributed equally in this study. In terms of marital status, 72.9% of the participants were married while 23.5% were single. More than half of the study participants were illiterate (57%) while only 6.8% had attained a university level. Considering monthly income, we found that most of the participants (81.3%) reported having a monthly income of less than 4000 Saudi Arabian Riyal (SAR) while 2.9% of them reported earning a monthly income of more than 8000 SAR (One U$ = SAR 3.75). Moreover, we found that around two-thirds of the participants were living in rural areas (62.6%) (Tables 1-2).

Table 1.
Demographic criteria of patients with ESRD in Jazan Region, Saudi Arabia.
Criteria Number Percent
Gender
Female 130 41.9
Male 180 58.1
Age
<20 14 4.5
20-40 85 27.4
40-60 141 45.5
60-80 66 21.3
>80 4 1.3
Nationality
Saudi 153 49.4
Non-Saudi 157 50.6
Marital Status
Divorced 3 1.0
Married 226 72.9
Single 73 23.5
Widow 8 2.6
Level of Education
Illiterate 176 56.8
Primary school 58 18.7
Secondary school 55 17.7
University 21 6.8
Monthly Income
<4000 252 81.3
4000-7999 49 15.8
8000 + 9 2.9
Residence
Rural 194 62.6
Urban 116 37.4
Table 2.
Reasons for no or late referral.
Reasons for Late Referral Number %
No data 196 77.7
No CKD screening by primary physicians 31 12.3
Referred but the system delayed the process 15 7.0
Referred but the patient refused the referral 10 4.0
Total 252 100

Hypertension (HTN) was implicated in 42.6% of patients as a cause of ESRD, followed by diabetes mellitus (DM) in 16%. The reasons for ESRD in eighteen percent of patients were unknown. Cardiac diseases, inherited diseases, chronic glomerulonephritis (CGN), Renal artery stenosis, and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) represented the minority of ESRD causes among our study participants (<10% each) as demonstrated in Fig. (1).

Our study sought to identify the reasons for the late referral of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) to nephrology specialists. In 77.7% of cases, we did not reveal any clear reason for late referral. This would be due to a lack of documentation or information on the patient's CKD status or referral history. The second most common reason was the absence of CKD screening by physicians, which accounted for 12.3% of cases. Referred but “the system delayed the process” accounted for 7.0% of cases. “Referred but the patient refused” accounted for 4.0% of all cases.

As shown in Fig. (2), most of the ESRD patients are referred late to the Nephrology specialists (81%).

In terms of current vascular access, we found that only half of the participants have an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) as a current vascular access, while internal jugular Perm cath represented 40% of hemodialysis accesses. Moreover, a femoral Perm catheter was used in 4.8% of the participants. Arteriovenous grafts (AVG) and inferior vena cava dialysis catheters have been reported in 2.3 and 2.9%, respectively as shown in Table 3.

Fig. (1).

Causes of ESRD in Jazan.

Fig. (2).

Early versus late referral of ESRD patients for hemodialysis preparation.

In terms of the association of ESRD causes with demographic variables, we found that the patients aged between 40-60 years were reported to be more likely to have HTN, DM, and unknown etiology as causes of their ESRD compared to their counterparts (P <0.001). Obviously, younger patients (<40 years) are more likely to have inherited diseases. ESRD secondary to diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or unknown etiology is more common among married individuals. No statistically significant differences were found in the other variable categories in association with the causes of ESRD as shown in Table 4.

With regard to whether early referral for hemodialysis was related to the patients’ demographic variables, we found that the illiterates were the least patients who were referred early for RRT compared to the patients who attained primary, secondary, or university levels of schools (13% vs 27.6%, 25.5%,23.8%, respectively). No statistically significant association was found with regard to other variables and early referral for dialysis preparation Table 5.

Table 3.
Vascular accesses used for hemodialysis patients in Jazan Region, Saudi Arabia.
Vascular Access Number Percent
AVF 155 50.0
IJ Perm cath 124 40.0
Femoral Perm cath 15 4.8
IVC 9 2.9
AVG 7 2.3
Total 310 100.0
Table 4.
Causes of ESRD in relation to the demographic variables.
Variables DM HTN Infection Inherited Others Unknown Total P
Gender
Male 28 (15.6%) 66 (36.7%) 8 (4.4%) 11 (6.1%) 30 (16.7%) 37 (20.6%) 180 (100%) >0.05
Female 22 (16.9%) 66 (50.8%) 4 (3.1%) 7 (5.4%) 12 (9.2%) 19 (14.6%) 130 (100%)
Age
<20 0 (0.0%) 1 (7.1%) 1 (7.1%) 4 (28.6%) 2 (14.3%) 6 (42.9%) 14 (100%) <0.001
20-40 9 (10.6%) 30 (35.3%) 5 (5.9%) 10 (11.8%) 16 (18.8%) 15 (17.6%) 85 (100%)
40-60 25 (17.7%) 72 (51.1%) 5 (3.5%) 3 (2.1%) 16 (11.3%) 20 (14.2%) 141 (100%)
60+ 16 (22.9%) 29(41.4%) 1 (1.4%) 1 (1.4%) 8 (11.4%) 15 (21.4%) 70 (100%)
Residency
Rural 32 (16.5%) 80 (41.2%) 9 (4.6%) 8 (4.1%) 30 (15.5%) 35 (18.0%) 194 (100%) >0.05
Urban 18 (15.5%) 52 (44.8%) 3 (2.6%) 10 (8.6%) 12 (10.3%) 21 (18.1%) 116 (100%)
Marital Status
Single 10 (23.7%) 20 (27.4%) 5 (6.8%) 12 (16.4%) 11 (15.1%) 15 (20.5%) 73 (100%) 0.01
Married 36 (15.9%) 107 (47.3%) 7 (3.1%) 6 (2.7%) 31 (13.7%) 39 (17.3%) 226 (100%)
Divorced 1 (33.3%) 1 (33.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (33.3%) 3 (100%)
Widow 3 (37.5%) 4 (50.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (12.5%) 8 (100%)
Educational Level
Illiterate 33 (18.8%) 81 (46.0%) 5 (2.8%) 7 (4.0%) 18 (10.2%) 32 (18.2%) 176 (100%) >0.05
Primary School 9 (15.5%) 22 (37.9%) 6 (10.3%) 6 (10.3%) 6 (10.3%) 9 (15.5%) 58 (100%)
Secondary School 8 (14.5%) 20 (36.4%) 1 (1.8%) 3 (5.5%) 14 (25.5%) 9 (16.4%) 55 (100%)
University and above 0 (0.0%) 9 (42.9%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (9.5%) 4 (19.0%) 6 (28.6%) 21 (100%)
Nationality
Non-Saudi 17 (10.8%) 72 (45.9%) 7 (4.5%) 12 (7.6%) 20 (12.7%) 29 (18.5%) 157 (100%) >0.05
Saudi 33 (21.6%) 60 (39.2%) 5 (3.3%) 6 (3.9%) 22 (14.4%) 27 (17.6%) 153 (100%)
Monthly Income (In Saudi Riyals)
<4000 44 108 10 16 29 45 252 >0.05
4000-8000 5 (10.2%) 23 (46.9%) 2 (4.1%) 0 (0.0%) 12 (24.5%) 7 (14.3%) 49 (100%)
8000+ 1 (11.1%) 1 (11.1%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (22.2%) 1 (11.1%) 4 (44.4%) 9 (100%)

Table 5.
The association between the participants’ sociodemographic characteristics with early and late referral to dialysis preparation.
Variables Late Referral Early Referral Total P
Gender
Male 142 (78.9%) 38 (21.1%) 180 (100%) >0.05
Female 110 (84.6%) 20 (15.4%) 130 (100%)
Age
<20 9 (64.3%) 5 (35.7%) 14 (100%) >0.05
20-40 72 (84.7%) 13 (15.3%) 85 (100%)
40-60 113 (80.1%) 28 (19.9%) 141 (100%)
60+ 58 (82.9%) 12 (17.1%) 70 (100%)
Residence
Rural 153 (78.9%) 41 (21.1%) 194 (100%) >0.05
Urban 99 (85.3%) 17 (14.7%) 116 (100%)
Marital Status
Single 63 (86.3%) 10 (13.7%) 73 (100%) >0.05
Married 178 (78.8%) 48 (21.2%) 226 (100%)
Divorced 3 (100%) 0 (0.0%) 3 (100%)
Widow 8 (100%) 0 (0.0%) 8 (100%)
Educational Level
Illiterate 153 (86.9%) 23 (13.1%) 176 (100%) 0.03
Primary School 42 (72.4%) 16 (27.6%) 58 (100%)
Secondary School 41 (74.5%) 14 (25.5%) 55 (100%)
University and above 16 (76.2%) 5 (23.8%) 21 (100%)
Nationality
Non-Saudi 133 (84.7%) 24 (15.3%) 157 (100%) >0.05
Saudi 119 (77.8%) 34 (22.2%) 153 (100%)
Monthly Income
<4000 208 (82.5%) 44 (17.5%) 252 (100%) >0.05
4000-8000 36 (73.5%) 13 (26.5%) 49 (100%)
8000+ 8 (88.9%) 1 (11.1%) 9 (100%)
Cause of ESRD
DM 44 (80.0%) 6 (12.0%) 50 (100%) >0.05
HTN 107 (81.1%) 25 (18.9%) 132 (100%)
Infection 7 (58.3%) 5 (41.7%) 12 (100%)
Inherited 15 (83.3%) 3 (16.7%) 18 (100%)
Others 35 (83.3%) 7 (16.7%) 42 (100%)
Unknown 44 (78.6%) 12 (21.4%) 56 (100%)

4. DISCUSSION

This study involved 310 hemodialysis patients; the majority were middle-aged males at 40-60 years. This observation is in line with both the local and global data, which indicate that a peak incidence of ESRD in such age groups is likely due to conditions such as hypertension and diabetes causing renal damage over time [3, 17-20]. The equal distribution of Saudis and non-Saudis possibly reflects the large expatriate workers population in Saudi Arabia [21]. Over half of the group was illiterate, and only 6.8% had attained a university education, which could contribute to the lack of awareness about kidney disease risks and complications [22, 23]. Individuals with lower levels of education have been found to have an increased risk of ESRD, complications of hemodialysis, and mortality [22]. A notable proportion of the group had low income, which can create financial barriers to accessing healthcare services [24]. Most patients in this study are residing in rural areas, where access to health care services is typically more limited in the region [3, 19, 24].

In the current study, we found that the most prevalent cause of ESRD was hypertension. Two studies conducted in Brazil showed the same finding (15–16). However, DM was the most common cause of ESRD, as reported in other two studies in Brazil and Palestine (17–18). This illustrates the disastrous consequences of these two silent killers and necessitates increased efforts to improve awareness among such populations to promote the prevention of their complications. On the other hand, cardiac disease, inherited diseases, infections, sickle cell disease, and renal stones are important but far less frequent causes. Moreover, 18% of our patients had an unknown cause of their ESRD. This could be due to the lack of optimal kidney health care services provided in the region as most patients are not referred to higher centers to perform renal biopsies or because of the nationality and financial status of the studied patients. However, most CKD patients have several risk factors that include diabetes, high blood pressure, heart disease, obesity, a family history of CKD, inherited kidney disorders, and older age [20, 23]. As such, it is crucial to educate individuals, especially those with a low education level, about the risk factors and complications of CKD to prevent the progression of kidney disease and its associated health problems and to inform the stakeholders to improve the medical services in this discipline.

Most patients in our study (81%) were referred late to nephrology care. Late referral increases morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced CKD [25-29]. There is a wide variation in the literature on the frequency of referral of advanced CKD patients for placement of vascular access. In a study held in northern India for instance, they found that the percentage of people with CKD referred late to nephrologists has reached up to 52% [30]. Several studies conducted worldwide on this matter showed heterogeneity in early referral rate for vascular access placement with most of them indicating a low early referral rate emphasizing that an ongoing challenge worldwide [31-36].

In our study, we found that the second most common reason for late referral was the absence of CKD screening by physicians, which accounted for 12.3% of cases, followed by the system delaying process which accounted for 7.0%, then it followed by patient refusal which accounted for 4.0% of all cases. The reasons for late referral, such as lack of screening and patient refusal, highlight the need for greater awareness and better communication around CKD risks and complications in the Saudi population [37]. Strategies like automatic eGFR reporting and education for primary care physicians could help improve screening and early referral [38]. It is also essential to empower patients through health literacy efforts to understand their disease better and to educate them about the importance of nephrology care [39]. A survey conducted on nephrologists in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia revealed several factors contributing to the delay in AVF creation, including patient denial of kidney disease or the need for AVF (76.4%), fears and practical concerns about hemodialysis (75.9%), and patient refusal (73.1%) [40].

A well-functioning vascular access (VA) is essential for carrying out an effective hemodialysis (HD) procedure. The native arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the best VA option due to lower rates of complications such as infectious, thrombotic risks, hospitalizations, and mortality compared to arteriovenous grafts (AVG) and central venous catheters (CVCs). Although AVG and CVCs would be alternative options in certain conditions [41, 42]. Despite the fact that the KDOQI guidelines recommend using AVFs as the preferred vascular access for hemodialysis patients whenever possible, our study showed that only half of the patients were using them. However, the guidelines may not be feasible to achieve the 50% target AVFs as primary vascular access at the facility level because the creation and maintenance of an AVF can be challenging [42]. The rate of AVFs in our study was lower than the rates in other countries such as Germany (84%), France (77%), Italy (90%), the United Kingdom (67%), Egypt (67.3%), Palestine (69.3%), Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia (56%) as well as Riyadh in Saudi Arabia [43-47]. However, it was higher than the proportion of AVF utilization in Ireland (45%). In our study, we found that the second most commonly used VA was CVCs (45%), including both internal jugular permcath and femoral permcath, which was much higher than other countries such as France (6%), Germany (4%), Spain (7%), the USA (15%), and Palestine [10, 46-52]. Collectively, our region has a lower prevalence of AVF and a higher proportion of catheters than developed nations. Given the favorable outcomes associated with AVFs placement, the regional decision-makers should be strict on the guidelines and make the necessary arrangements to ensure optimal renal care delivery to our hemodialysis patients.

Regarding the association between the causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and demographic variables, in our study, we found that older patients were reported to be more likely to have HTN, DM, and unknown etiology as causes of their ESRD. A study conducted in India in 2014 found that there is a significant association between ESRD and advanced age [53]. Another study conducted in Korea found a direct association between age and the development of CKD as well as an increased incidence of the elderly having additional risk factors of CKD [54]. Moreover, a study conducted in China in 2022 found that aged participants are more susceptible to hypertensive nephropathy than younger participants [55].

Age is a significant risk factor for the development of ESRD, and the relationship between age and the causes of ESRD is complex. Inherited kidney diseases, such as polycystic kidney disease, are more common among younger individuals and can lead to ESRD. These conditions are typically genetic and can cause the kidneys to gradually lose their function over time. On the other hand, chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease are more common among middle-aged and older individuals. These conditions can cause damage to the kidneys leading to chronic kidney disease and eventually ESRD [56-58].

It is worth noting that while these age ranges are expected for the development of certain conditions, ESRD can develop at any age and can have various causes. Other risk factors such as obesity, smoking, and a family history of kidney disease can also contribute to the development of ESRD regardless of age. Overall, understanding the relationship between age and the causes of ESRD can help inform strategies for prevention and early intervention to reduce the risk of developing this condition [58, 59].

In the current study, we found that there is no relationship between the educational level and the cause of ESRD. This finding is consistent with a case-control study conducted in Sa’ada City, Yemen, which found that the educational level had no relation to ESRD cause [60]. However, another study conducted in the Netherlands found that there is a significant association between educational level and elevated risk of causes of ESRD, increased incidence of diabetes, and other modifiable risk factors including abdominal obesity, smoking, low potassium intake, and hypertension, showing that those who are less educated are thought to be more likely to have this association [61].

Our study also showed that there is a statistically significant association between marital status and the causes of ESRD. The finding is similar to another study conducted in Cameroon where a significant relationship to the causes of ESRD existed [62]. Nevertheless, it is known that family and social status independently affect the well-being of ESRD patients [63]. The association of marital status with the development of ESRD could be explained by several factors. For example, married individuals may have better social support networks, which can help them manage their health and cope with the challenges of CKD and ESRD.

This study also indicated that patients with higher education tend to be referred earlier for the treatment of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This finding is consistent with a study conducted in India which found that patients with higher education were referred earlier than those with lower education levels [30]. Similarly, the studies conducted in Poland, Hungary, and Romania found that patients with higher education were more likely to receive early referrals for ESRD treatment [64]. The implications of these findings are significant, as early referral for ESRD treatment is associated with better patient outcomes and reduced healthcare costs. The reasons for the association of higher education with early referral are not entirely clear. Patients with higher education may be more likely to be aware of the symptoms and risk factors of ESRD, leading them to seek medical attention earlier. Additionally, healthcare providers may be more likely to refer patients with higher education levels due to better communication and understanding of the disease process. Overall, the findings from these studies suggested that efforts to increase awareness and education about ESRD may be beneficial in improving early referrals and patient outcomes. Healthcare providers should be aware of the potential for educational disparities in ESRD referrals and work to ensure that all patients receive appropriate and timely care [30, 65].

To our knowledge, this is the first study to be conducted in Jazan province to evaluate the baseline characteristics of hemodialysis patients and the rate of vascular access preparation. Another strong point in this study is the involvement of all governmental hemodialysis centers in Jazan, which allows for better evaluation and generalizability of study findings. Nonetheless, some notable limitations to our study should be discussed. The data has been recorded from patients' files and complimented with direct patients interviews due to a lack of inadequate data to cover the data instrument items. However, this hybrid approach to data collection has allowed better coverage of all study question variables. The practicing nephrologists may have to put an additional effort of documentations in order to improve hemodialysis patients’ outcomes and help the stakeholders to perform the necessary actions.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of ESRD on hemodialysis has been shown to be higher in middle-aged male patients. Hypertension is the most implicated cause of ESRD in this cohort. AVF is less utilized as the preferred hemodialysis vascular access in Jazan region. The majority of study participants were referred late or even not referred. Early referral rates were significantly influenced by the educational level. Improvement of overall regional nephrology care is of paramount importance particularly for early referral for renal replacement therapy and arteriovenous fistula as the preferred vascular access in hemodialysis patients.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

It is hereby acknowledged that all authors have accepted responsibility for the manuscript's content and consented to its submission. They have meticulously reviewed all results and unanimously approved the final version of the manuscript.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

CKD = Chronic Kidney Disease
HTN = Hypertension
DM = Diabetes Mellitus
eGFR = Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate
RRT = Renal Replacement Therapy
ESRD = End-stage Renal Disease
HD = Hemodialysis
SCA = Sickle Cell Anemia
CGN = Chronic Glomerulonephritis
SLE = Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
KDIGO = Kidney Disease Initiative Global Outcomes
MOH = Ministry of Health
VA = Vascular Access
AVG = Arteriovenous Grafts
AVF = Arteriovenous Fistula
CVCs = Central Venous Catheters

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

The study was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee-MOH in Jazan, Saudia Arabia Approval No.:22060; date:29 June 2022.

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

All human research procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the committee responsible for human experimentation (institutional and national), and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2013.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

For participants whose data were not available in the electronic system, informed consent was taken.

STANDARDS OF REPORTING

STROBE guidelines were followed.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

The data supporting the findings of the article is available in the [Jazan general directorate, ministry of health] at [https://www.moh.gov.sa/jazan].

FUNDING

None.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

REFERENCES

1
Levey AS, de Jong PE, Coresh J, et al. The definition, classification, and prognosis of chronic kidney disease: A KDIGO controversies conference report. Kidney Int 2011; 80(1). : 17-28.
2
Charles C, Ferris AH. Chronic kidney disease. Prim Care 2020; 47(4): 585-95.
3
Mousa D, Alharbi A, Helal I, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of chronic kidney disease among relatives of hemodialysis patients in Saudi Arabia. Kidney Int Rep 2021; 6(3): 817-20.
4
Bolton WK. Renal physicians association clinical practice guideline: Appropriate patient preparation for renal replacement therapy: Guideline number 3. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14(5): 1406-10.
5
Bolton WK, Owen WF Jr. Preparing the patient for renal replacement therapy. Postgrad Med 2002; 111(6): 97-108, 101-104, 107-108.
6
Huang X, Carrero JJ. Better prevention than cure: optimal patient preparation for renal replacement therapy. Kidney Int 2014; 85(3): 507-10.
7
Gøransson LG, Bergrem H. Consequences of late referral of patients with end‐stage renal disease. J Intern Med 2001; 250(2): 154-9.
8
Smart NA, Titus TT. Outcomes of early versus late nephrology referral in chronic kidney disease: A systematic review. Am J Med 2011; 124(11): 1073-1080.e2.
9
National kidney foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39: S1-266.
10
Keith DS, Nichols GA, Gullion CM, Brown JB, Smith DH. Longitudinal follow-up and outcomes among a population with chronic kidney disease in a large managed care organization. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164(6): 659-63.
11
Eriksen BO, Ingebretsen OC. The progression of chronic kidney disease: A 10-year population-based study of the effects of gender and age. Kidney Int 2006; 69(2): 375-82.
12
Foley RN, Murray AM, Li S, et al. Chronic kidney disease and the risk for cardiovascular disease, renal replacement, and death in the United States Medicare population, 1998 to 1999. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005; 16(2): 489-95.
13
Saggi SJ, Allon M, Bernardini J, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Shaffer R, Mehrotra R. Considerations in the optimal preparation of patients for dialysis. Nat Rev Nephrol 2012; 8(7): 381-9.
14
Jungers P, Massy ZA, Choukroun G, et al. Longer duration of predialysis nephrological care is associated with improved long-term survival of dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2021; 16(12): 2357-64.
15
Jazan: Over 350 dialysis beds for patients with renal failure. 2020. Available from: https://www.moh.gov.sa/en/Ministry/MediaCenter/News/Pages/News-2020-05-06-001.aspx
16
Cooper BA, Branley P, Bulfone L, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of early versus late initiation of dialysis. N Engl J Med 2010; 363(7): 609-19.
17
Saran R, Robinson B, Abbott KC, et al. US renal data system 2019 annual data report: Epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2020; 75(1): A6-7.
18
Johansen KL, Chertow GM, Gilbertson DT, et al. US renal data system 2022 Annual data report: Epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2023; 81(3): A8-A11.
19
Alsuwaida AO, Farag YM, Al Sayyari AA, et al. Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (SEEK-Saudi investigators) - A pilot study. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2010; 21(6): 1066-72.
20
Ansari M, Al-Adeem M, Alshakka M. Comorbidity among patients with kidney diseases in Hail Region, Saudi Arabia. Int J Diabetes Clin Res 2019; 6(1): 104.
21
General authority for statistics. Chapter 01: Population & Demography. 2019. Available from: https://www.stats.gov.sa/en/1007-0
22
Green JA, Cavanaugh KL. Understanding the influence of educational attainment on kidney health and opportunities for improved care. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2015; 22(1): 24-30.
23
Gurgel do Amaral MS, Reijneveld SA, Geboers B, Navis GJ, Winter AF. Low health literacy is associated with the onset of CKD during the life course. J Am Soc Nephrol 2021; 32(6): 1436-43.
24
Alobaidi S. Knowledge of chronic kidney disease among the population of Saudi Arabia evaluated using a validated questionnaire: A cross-sectional study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2021; 15: 1281-8.
25
Oliveira Junior HM, Formiga FFC, Alexandre CS. Clinical and epidemiological profile of chronic hemodialysis patients in João Pessoa - PB. J Bras Nefrol 2014; 36(3): 367-74.
26
Tazza L, Mandolfo S, Carbonari L, et al. Developing Recommendations for Vascular Access for Hemodialysis: Vascular Access Working Group of the Italian Society of Nephrology. The Journal of Vascular Access 2011; 12(1): 13-6.10.5301/JVA. 2011.6217
27
Sarmento LR, Fernandes PFCBC, Pontes MX, et al. Prevalence of clinically validated primary causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in a State Capital in Northeastern Brazil. J Bras Nefrol 2018; 40(2): 130-5.
28
Khader M, Snouber S, Alkhatib A, Nazzal Z, Dudin A. Prevalence of patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis in the West Bank, Palestine. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2013; 24(4): 832-7.
29
Chan MR, Dall AT, Fletcher KE, Lu N, Trivedi H. Outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease referred late to nephrologists: A meta-analysis. Am J Med 2007; 120(12): 1063-1070.e2.
30
Dhanorkar M, Prasad N, Kushwaha R, et al. Impact of early versus late referral to nephrologists on outcomes of chronic kidney disease patients in Northern India. Int J Nephrol 2022; 2022: 1-10.
31
SchmidtRJ.DomicoGR.HobbsG.Early referral and its impact on emerging first-line dialysis, healthcare costs, and outcomes. Iran J Kidney Dis 1998; 32(2): 278-83.
32
Shin SJ, Kim HW, Chung S, et al. Late referral to a nephrologist increases the risk of uremia-related cardiac hypertrophy in patients on hemodialysis. Nephron Clin Pract 2007; 107(4): c139-46.
33
Stack AG. Effect of timing of nephrology referral and pre-ESRD care on mortality risk among patients with ESRD in the United States. Iran J Kidney Dis 2003; 41(2): 310-8.
34
Stoves J, Bartlett CN, Newstead CG. Specialist follow up of patients before end stage renal failure and its relationship to survival on dialysis. Postgrad Med J 2001; 77(911): 586-8.
35
Van Biesen W, Wiedemann M, Lameire N. End-stage renal disease treatment: A European perspective. J Am Soc Nephrol 1998; 9: S55-62.Winkelmayer WC, Owen WF, Levin R, et al. A propensity analysis of late versus early nephrologist referral and mortality on dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14(2): 486-92.
36
Alghamdi M, Alhozali H, Bokhary O, et al. Impact of early nephrology referral on the outcomes of patients with acute kidney injury. Saudi J Med Med Sci 2022; 10(3): 221-6.
37
Arora P, Obrador GT, Ruthazer R, et al. Prevalence, predictors, and consequences of late nephrology referral at a tertiary care center. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999; 10(6): 1281-6.
38
Komenda P, Ferguson TW, Macdonald K, et al. Cost-effectiveness of primary screening for CKD: A systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis 2014; 63(5): 789-97.
39
Fraser SDS, Roderick PJ, Casey M, Taal MW, Yuen HM, Nutbeam D. Prevalence and associations of limited health literacy in chronic kidney disease: A systematic review. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013; 28(1): 129-37.
40
Alfarhan M, Almatrafi S, Alqaseer S, Albkiry Y, AlSayyari A. Causes of the delay in creating permanent vascular access in hemodialysis patients. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2020; 31(6): 1217-24.
41
Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis 2006; 48: S176-247.
42
Lok CE, Huber TS, Lee T, et al. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for vascular access: 2019 update. Am J Kidney Dis 2020; 75: S1-S164.
43
Ethier J, Mendelssohn DC, Elder SJ, et al. Vascular access use and outcomes: An international perspective from the dialysis outcomes and practice patterns study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23(10): 3219-26.
44
Pisoni RL, Young EW, Dykstra DM, et al. Vascular access use in Europe and the United States: Results from the DOPPS. Kidney Int 2002; 61(1): 305-16.
45
Afifi A, Refaat H, Wahba AM, et al. Hemodialysis vascular access among chronic renal failure patients in Egypt. J Vasc Access 2002; 3(4): 164-8.
46
Qasaimeh GR, Qaderi SE, Omari GA, Badadweh MA. Vascular access infection among hemodialysis patients in Northern Jordan: Incidence and risk factors. South Med J 2008; 101(5): 508-12.
47
Saeed Abdulrahman I, Al-Mueilo SH, Bokhary HA, Ladipo GOA, Al-Rubaish A. A prospective study of hemodialysis access-related bacterial infections. J Infect Chemother 2002; 8(3): 242-6.
48
Pisoni RL, Zepel L, Port FK, Robinson BM. Trends in US vascular access use, patient preferences, and related practices: An Update from the US DOPPS practice monitor with international comparisons. Am J Kidney Dis 2015; 65(6): 905-15.
49
Dwyer A, Shelton P, Brier M, Aronoff G. A vascular access coordinator improves the prevalent fistula rate. Semin Dial 2012; 25(2): 239-43.
50
Allon M. Fistula first: Recent progress and ongoing challenges. Am J Kidney Dis 2011; 57(1): 3-6.
51
Lynch JR, Mohan S, McClellan WM. Achieving the goal. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2011; 20(6): 583-92.
52
Kukhon F, Hamdan Z, As’ad N, Sawalmeh O, Shraim M. Vascular access types in hemodialysis patients in palestine and factors affecting their distribution: A cross-sectional study. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2019; 30(1): 166-74.
53
Anupama YJ, Uma G. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease among adults in a rural community in South India: Results from the kidney disease screening (KIDS) project. Indian J Nephrol 2014; 24(4): 214-21.
54
Kim TH, Lee MJ, Yoo KB, Han E, Choi JW. Association of demographic and socioeconomic factors with risk factors for chronic kidney disease. J Prev Med Public Health 2015; 48(3): 170-7.
55
Wu Y, Huang B, Zhang W, et al. The interaction analysis between advanced age and longer dialysis vintage on the survival of patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. J Int Med Res 2022; 50(4): 3000605221088557.
56
Hashmi MF, Benjamin O, Lappin SL. End-Stage Renal Disease 2024.
57
Sawaf H, Gudura TT, Dorobisz S, Sandy D, Wang X, Bobart SA. Genetic susceptibility to chronic kidney disease: Links, risks and management. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis 2023; 16: 1-15.
58
Mallappallil M, Friedman EA, Delano BG, McFarlane SI, Salifu MO. Chronic kidney disease in the elderly: Evaluation and management. Clin Pract (Lond) 2014; 11(5): 525-35.
59
Levey A S, Atkins R, Coresh J, et al. Chronic kidney disease as a global public health problem: Approaches and initiatives - A position statement from kidney disease improving global outcomes. Kidney Int 2007; 72(3): 247-59.
60
Dahnan M, Assabri AM, Khader YS. Risk factors for end-stage renal failure among patients on hemodialysis in Aljomhory Hospital, Sa’adah governorate, Yemen: Hospital-based case-control study. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2019; 5(3): e14215.
61
Thio CHL, Vart P, Kieneker LM, Snieder H, Gansevoort RT, Bültmann U. Educational level and risk of chronic kidney disease: Longitudinal data from the PREVEND study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2020; 35(7): 1211-8.
62
Halle MP, Takongue C, Kengne AP, Kaze FF, Ngu KB. Epidemiological profile of patients with end stage renal disease in a referral hospital in Cameroon. BMC Nephrol 2015; 16(1): 59.
63
Patzer RE, McClellan WM. Influence of race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status on kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol 2012; 8(9): 533-41.
64
Marrón B, Ostrowski J, Török M, et al. Type of referral, dialysis start and choice of renal replacement therapy modality in an international integrated care setting. PLoS One 2016; 11(5): e0155987.
65
Chan CT, Blankestijn PJ, Dember LM, et al. Dialysis initiation, modality choice, access, and prescription: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int 2019; 96(1): 37-47.